Why Was The 1848 Public Health Act Ineffective?
The 1848 Public Health Act was ineffective largely because it was permissive. It was generally ignored and its advice was not taken. The permissiveness of the act was not the only reason why it was ineffective. Many other factors contributed to its failing.The permissiveness of the act is evident from the fact that it was only going to be used for five years. This was clearly not enough time to make the changes necessary and improve the public health of working class. By making the act compulsory for five years, it made it seem to the public that the government were doing something when they weren't. The act was still permissive. Many towns saw the permissive nature of the act as a reason for not implementing it. Large cities bypassed the act by getting private acts of parliament to carry out of their own improvements. However, not every city did this, so many of them were avoiding public health reform altogether. The Times said in a memorable passage,'it would rather take its chance of cholera than be forced into good health by new Public Health Board'. This clea
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Health Act, Health Board', Board Health, Commission Sewers, public health, Sanitary Act, act ineffective, Public Health, public health act, local authorities, permissiveness act, act introduced, health reform, act compulsory, act reason, health act, , faire act introduced, public health reform, lack vote class, lack vote, laissez faire act,
Approximate Word count = 731
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
