Direct democracy
Should Canadians have a direct democracy? Are the Canadian people capable of making decisions for themselves or should they elect people that can make the decisions for them? We here in Canada claim to be a nation of democracy, but in truth we are not. Democracy is defined by Websters dictionary as "government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them, or elected agents under a free electoral system"a. The people of Canada certainly do not exercise this "supreme power" themselves, and the elected officials supposedly representing them answer only to their party leaders, and they in turn to the supporters of their party, "big business". So then why don't we live in a true democracy? It comes to the question of: are Canadians competent enough to govern themselves? Many people feel that they cannot, and that more educated and intelligent people should govern over them, making their decisions for !them. Ironically some of the people saying this are the ones that presently run the country! What is a direct democracy then? It is defined as the right of citizens to hold referendums on any issues they feel are in dispute, and to veto legislation. In
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Charlottetown Accord, , Federal Representative, Safety Happinessd, Beedam Democracy, Yes Canada, Barber Canadians, Carlton Strangely, Democratic Party, Canada Democracy, direct democracy, true democracy, democracy canada, country direct, govern themselves, vote issues, elected officials, country direct democracy, informed decision, web chat line, citizens hold, competent vote issues, voter turnout, local web chat, nation wide referendum,
Approximate Word count = 2429
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
