In this controversy there is two sides, the Pro-alcohol side, and the Anti-alcohol side. The anti-alcohol side has a huge following of mothers, authorities, and other groups that protest the use of alcohol. They have an extremely strong arguments such as it impairs your ability to make decisions,

it ruins your body, and obviously, its against the law. The anti-alcohol group pretty well knows banning alcohol all together is close to impossible.

Their real fight is with underage drinking. Underage drinking is the major problem with alcohol. As long as it is available, underage people will get their hands on it one way or another. This is what the anti-alcohol group really tries to pinpoint. Controlling underage drinking has been a problem for many years and the only way to stop it is to increase the punishment for people who do get caught in possession of alcohol who are underage. Yet that still does not do the trick. It is an uphill battle to stopping underage drinking. This is where the anti-alcohol group says the only way to stop it is to ban alcohol altogether. But it's happened before and we all know what happened with that. So that option is basically thrown out the window.

----------------------------------------------------------

Some common words found in the essay are:
Pro-alcohol Anti-alcohol, DRINKING Alcohol, underage drinking, don't care, age 21, alcohol underage, people age 21, alcohol underage drinking, civil disobedience, possession alcohol, agree rule, people age, people drink,
Approximate Word count = 642
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)