A Critique of Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility

In his work, Utilitarianism, J S Mill asserts that, “happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end; all other things being only desirable as means to that end.” He goes on to offer a “proof” of the principle of utility (which may be defined as ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’), through which he hopes to show that the moral worth of an action consists in its conduciveness or otherwise to the general happiness. In this essay, I will attempt to show that Mill’s proof is unsound and that unrestricted utilitarianism is an undesirable moral doctrine at both societal and personal levels.

At the commencement of his enquiry into “of what sort of proof the principle of utility is susceptible”, Mill declares that, “to be incapable of proof by reasoning is common to all first principles, to the first premises of our knowledge, as well as to those of our conduct” (Ch.4). Rather than present a rational argument in favour of utilitarianism, then, Mill asks his reader to reflect upon their inner motives for action and suggests that these are based upon a desire for one’s own happiness. “This, however, being a fact, we have

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Ethical Theory, Thirdly Moore, BH CH, Ch4 Mills, Mills Proof, Utilitarianism Mill, Jeremy Bentham, Ch4 Mill, University Press, principle utility, Ch2 Mills, mills proof, act promote, university press, situation wherein, promote happiness, proof principle utility, moderately happy, own happiness, produce happiness, special concern, act promote happiness, oxford oxford university, oxford university press, modern moral philosophy,
Approximate Word count = 2292
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)