Homosexual Marriage
ÒMarriage has changed to suit society throughout timeÓ (Economist 161). From interracial marriages to procreation views, society has allowed itÕs favourite institution, marriage, the flexibility to change and grow with the times. Then why can society not accept the addition of homosexual marriage today? The arguments against homosexual marriage are close-minded and transparent, and have little place in modern society. Arguments on such topics as religion, procreation, and child rearing can be easily and logically discounted with a minimum of thought. Yet still legislation, such as the Defense of Marriage Act, continues to undermine the Constitution. Because of the act, which was signed into law in September of 1996 by Bill Clinton, the full faith-and-credit clause from Article 4 of the constitution is made worthless (Sullivan 167). Similar actions have been taken into society to prevent homosexual marriage, though many people do not give any actual thought to the matter, accepting what is considered to be a societal norm. In actuality, homosexual marriage would have a positive influence upon todayÕs society, which is consistently proven by the arguments between homosexual marriage advocates and opposition.
In fact, since 1965, the purpose of marriage in the United States has not been procreation. A series of Supreme Court rulings in the year battled down the remaining laws banning the sale of contraceptives to married couples (Lehr 48). Legally, since that point in time, marriage has been for more than procreation. If the government was to use the argument that homosexuals could not marry because of their inability to reproduce, married heterosexual couples would not be able to reasoning is perfect and fail-safe, yet it is easily countered in an advanced country such as the United States. homosexual marriage would cause the struggling institution to suffer from an Òidentity crisisÓ of sorts (Commonweal 152). While again the arguments against homosexual marriage are thought to be impenetrable, they are easily discounted.
Some common words found in the essay are:
Bill Clinton, United Homosexual, Marriage Act, Virginia Francoeur, Bob BarrÕs, Supreme Court, Donald DeMarco, , Conservative Catholic, African American, homosexual marriage, homosexual couples, heterosexual couples, todayÕs society, definition marriage, arguments homosexual marriage, arguments homosexual, defense marriage act, modern society, defense marriage, legal definition, homosexual couple, legalization homosexual marriage, homosexual marriage religious, legal definition marriage,
Approximate Word count = 1951
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
