The Natural Law Theory rests upon a certain view of what the world is like. In this view the world has rational order and values within its structure. Everything in nature has purpose. These natural laws also explain how things ought to be. Things are said to be as they ought to when serving their natural purposes. There are als

In conclusion, I believe that Kant's theory is a more plausible one in this day and age. I believe that his justification of good will to do an action is a good indicator of a moral good being done. I did not use my autonomous will to plug myself into the violinist; I was put there because of forces outside my body. Therefore, even if I did choose to keep myself plugged in, I would not be doing a moral deed, according to Kant. There is a need in this world for universal maxims, people change dispositions in different circumstances, as in the religion example mentioned earlier. Kant's theory, rules are necessary to keep moral order could be a real and working theory. My only objection to the Natural Law Theory is that it says people must act in accordance with nature. "What is the case" and "what ought to be the case" are logically different notions, and no real conclusion about one follows from the other. People may be beneficent, but it does not follow that they should be beneficent. Facts and values are two different things. In comparison, Kant makes a very logical connection between rules and morality, Morality exists when it arises from a universalizable maxim, set of rules and facts based on knowledge, which can be applied universally. The only thing Kant does not account for are emotions, and they do a play a role in lives of human beings.

Everyone should be aware of his/her duty, or how one ought to act. This assumes rationality. Rationality may also be applied to those things that are not done from duty, or perhaps evil. Freedom must be assumed to fulfill moral obligation, "I see duty, I do it." Perhaps, the Society of Music Lovers were acting from duty because they used reason to find me. However, they took away from me, the possibility of acting from duty, by imposing the act of being life support to the violinist.

The categorical imperatives are a set of commands to direct our will. These apply to all people and commands conduct immediately, without having any other purpose or conditions. It is categorical because of its application to all rational beings and imperative because it's the principle by which one should act. The basic formulation of the categorical imperative is: "Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law." Other formulations of the categorical imperative include; not treating other human beings as a mere means rather than as an end, and that of the will regarding itself when making a universal law. If we act w

Some common words found in the essay are:
Immanuel Kant's, Law Theory, Music Lovers, Immanuel Kant, Law Theorist, natural law, Natural Law, law theory, natural law theory, , categorical imperative, according natural, categorical imperatives, set rules, moral goodness, according natural law, kant's theory, According Natural, moral goodness according, view world, moral natural,
Approximate Word count = 1710
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)