Which would be your interpretation of Hamlet, and why?

Trapped inside the prison of his mind, chained by a grief consciousness served only to torture him with, Hamlet, the prince of Denmark, reveals to the world that more gruesome than the death thinking brings him is the carnage it brings to those around him. Which builds up to the question, was Hamlet mad or was it all an act to distract people from his thoughts to his actions. Hamlet's character and mood changes drastically in the play. It is difficult to understand why he would put the act of madness because all it brings him is attention and suspicion. This could be a useful method to build up the opportunity to kill the king, which is a likely option seeing that Hamlet does not want to kill the king conspicuously because it is what Claudius did to his father. Claudius is seen by Hamlet as immoral, disgusting and 'beast-like', and Hamlet wants to contradict that completely. He wants justice for his father's death, wh

Freudian psychologists argue that there is such an influence called unconsciousness. They argue that even though we cannot physically hold a grasp of unconsciousness, it is probably influencing every move of one's life. Shakespeare demonstrates this process what is against one's personal ethical code due to one's extreme desire to complete a task. This creates a sense of guilt in unconsciousness and will eventually open a way to downfall, which is true in Hamlet's case.

As the story closes, Hamlet does become a killer, and we lose personal touch with him. This is shown in the way that we see less of Hamlet and his thoughts in the soliloquies. This could mean he is having fewer doubts. He does seem more definite in person, especially in Act 4 scene 4. Hamlet has changed, as he is more definite this time, and we can only see one way where he can travel. He is falling with everything around him, which was one of his objectives from the start. Another interpretation of Hamlet would be to say he doesn't value his life or life of other individuals as he feels death is inevitable. He is obsessed with death throughout the play, and I feel he derives from the obsession of murder in the society. In the Elizabethan era death, or murder was a valid issue, as the new queen was despised as there was controversy towards who should get the throne in the country.

In Elizabethan times, death was seen morally acceptable if it was out of honour and loyalty. This is apparent in Hamlet's character as he questions himself many times, having doubts considering his actions in the future. Hamlet is able to bring out the audience's opinions on whether the deaths are deserved, or justified. It would be seen acceptable if Hamlet executed Claudius in revengeful circumstances based on his instinct, but Hamlet anticipated this to happen too long which made his feelings and emotions intense as the days passed.

Part of Hamlet's act or character was based upon the issue of beauty of the opposite sex. Hamlet says to Ophelia, "That if you be honest and fair, your honesty should admit no discourse to your beauty" (act 3 scene 1). He is saying that Ophelia can be honest and fair, but honesty is an inward trait, and fairness is an outward trait,

Some common words found in the essay are:
Hamlet Trapped, Claudius Hamlet's, Hamlets Gertrude, Hamlet Ophelia, Continuing Hamlet's, King Corinth, Sigmund Freud, , Queen Jocasta, Oedipus Hamlet, play hamlet, scene 4 hamlet, act 3 scene, scene 4, interpretation hamlet, hamlet's character, 3 scene, 4 hamlet, hamlet completely, act 3, ophelia honest fair, honest fair honesty, repressed desire, fair honesty,
Approximate Word count = 1505
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)