Race
“Race” is not a black or white issue in the social sciences, and for the last sixty years it has been increasingly called into question. This paper will answer three specific questions dealing with the social scientific criticisms of “race.” The three questions will deal with the social construction of reality, the justification of basic concepts supporting the idea of separate races, and explaining the cause of high rates of hypertension among African-Americans.Our first question: When the author says that the classification of races is arbitrary, how is this similar to our discussion of the social construction of reality? Social construction of reality is a process by which a definition of reality is: 1) Socially created 2) Are internalized, and 3) Taken for granted. Classification of races is arbitrary because it is not based on fact and is not consistently applied. An example of this classification was during the racism of the late nineteenth century, mulattos had to either “pass” as whites or join wit
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Hypertension African-Americans, , Richard Lewontin, American Cherokee, construction reality, social construction reality, social construction, hypertension african-americans, blood pressure, nineteenth century, rates hypertension, rates hypertension african-americans, classification races arbitrary, cause rates hypertension, separate races, classification races, cause rates, social conditions,
Approximate Word count = 687
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
