Anarchy, emergence of
New York Times, on Sunday, November 8, had an article on sentences addressed by a Federal judge to three members of the antigovernment Montana Freemen for conspiracy and fraud; the article stirred my memory and concern about this paper, as well as brought into play many of the dilemmas discussed in the Nature of Politics class. However, I do not wish to analyze this particular article or cult, but the emergence of anarchy. There have been theories and diagnosis of human nature: the Aristotelian, teleo- logical view of the political animal, the Platonic, metaphorical view of the chained caveman, the Hobbian, phobic view of savage life as inevitably ‘short’, and many notable others. Regardless of the differences found in these, there is a common denominator found in all. That is, human beings move from the animalistic, passive stage to the civilized stage in order to materialize their potential in full. In this domain, governments serve as expedients or facilitators of an anthropological movement. The mechanism may differ from one type of government to another, but its principal, common function is to lay and protect the foundations for a prosper
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
BC Cynics, Michel Foucault, Aristophanes Xenophon, Eventually Cynics, Nature Politics, St Anselm, Soviet Union, Henry-David Thoreau, Sweden Switzerland, Montana Freemen, human nature, veterans form particular, homogeneity basic animal, basic animal preferences, share common, homogeneity basic, view human, justice anarchy, form particular, ignorant nobles, hardly share common, hardly share, basic animal, veterans form, view human nature,
Approximate Word count = 2739
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
