While under British rule, India was given no choice but to follow strict regulations such as paying a heavy tax on salt. Because the British had a royal monopoly on the manufacture of salt in India, the people of India were unable to afford the high prices, and that lead to increasing levels of starvation and poverty. The country believed that a change for the better was needed. One man led the fight for the people of India to break away from the rulings of the British

The facts are simply stated; Gandhi tells of how much wealth Britain is stealing from poor India. With the statistics of how much more Lord Irwin makes compared to the average salary of India, and how much the British Prime Minister makes compared to Great Britain's average income, this comparison exploits the large revenue Britain earns off of India. This shows that Gandhi has done his research and he is not accusing without proof. Gandhi's ethos of having been well educated is shown. Still Gandhi continues to show that the people in India are not stupid, that they are knowledgeable and understand the full consequences, and know that this march is the right thing to do.

Mahatma Gandhi was a courageous man, who employed a very important strategy for himself and India which he obeyed his whole life: never to use violence, even if others would use violence against him. Having studied law in London to become a lawyer, he was a very well educated man who used his knowledge and strategy of nonviolence to fight for India's independence from Britain. Gandhi became the speaker for the entire nation of India. It is very critical to make this known to Lord Irwin, because it enhances his ethos. Gandhi is an intelligent leader that will lead India to its independence from Britain.

If the people of India had read this letter, this might have motivated even more of them to go on with the march. Gandhi has put forth great effort, thought, and time before writing this letter. He knows exactly what needed to be said, and does so in a sincere manner. Gandhi wrote this polite letter intended to only give the reasoning why they must march. He gives facts and examples of the unfair treatment the people of India face everyday. I don't think Gandhi thought that this letter would create any drastic changes concerning the rules. Neither would Lord Irwin spontaneously accommodate to the wants of the people of India. I feel this was only to get into the mind of Lord Irwin, and make him think seriously about the problems Britain is causing India. With having the "conversion" impact, this might have opened the eyes of Lord Irwin over time while the people of India marched on. This letter was very persuading. But there is no way that this can persuade Lord Irwin into changing, he may agree with Gandhi and see where he is coming from, but cannot change just for a dear friend.

In "Letter to Lord Irwin", Gandhi addresses the issue of the upcoming salt march he had planned for March 12, 1930 and the reasons for its necessity. This letter was written to Lord Irwin who was the British viceroy of India at the time. Gandhi wrote this letter to inform Lord Irwin about why the people of India are upset and why they must march and to persuade that Britain must release India. Lord Irwin represents the country of Britain; to convince him would be the same as targeting his audience of Britain.

The beginning of the letter is intended to show Lord

Some common words found in the essay are:
Lord Irwin, British British, Plea Freedom, lord irwin, Britain Gandhi, Irwin Gandhi, India Gandhi, Mahatma Gandhi, Gandhi Gandhi, Lord Irwin's, Britain Gandhi's, people india, britain gandhi, india lord irwin, irwin consider, respect towards, lord irwin consider, lord irwin gandhi, irwin gandhi, india lord, independence britain, sympathy lord irwin, sympathy lord, rules britain, irwin consider gandhi,
Approximate Word count = 1994
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)