In this economic time of a feared recession our government should be doing everything in their power to avoid this situation. Having a prolonged tax cut does nothing to help the economy now. By the time the money is given back we and more than likely to have already succeeded this economic down low. The economist will tell you the in order to dodge this the money must be given back now. If the money is given back earlier there is a better chance of people spending it and stimulating

Another topic discussed was the Social Security lockbox. In his campaign, Bush also said that he would keep this money safe. In order not to have to decrease his tax cuts and spending he may have to use money from the Social Security funds. If he does this I think that he will be showing Americans the he can't keep a promise. He promised not to use that money. It's not worth it in the long run to use this for a short-term stimulus.

economic activity. When looked at by this point of view I most definitely agree with Laura D'Andrea Tyson when she said, "Bush wants a large tax cut for political reasons, not economic ones."

When Robert J. Barro discuses how he thinks the tax cut will stimulate investment and growth, increase incentives to work and save, and lower the amount of money Congress can spend, I find myself disagreeing with him. As said earlier Bush's tax cut will do very little, if anything, to help stimulate growth. Ten years is a very long time. As for increasing the incentive to work and save, I find it hard to want to save my money when they take it away for taxes. If you

Some common words found in the essay are:
Robert Barro, Policy Real, Social Security, Tyson Bush, tax cut, real people, fiscal policy, amount money, lower amount money, fiscal policy united, Paper Lindsay, money congress spend, congress spend, amount money congress, bush's tax, spending money, incentive save, policy united, money congress,
Approximate Word count = 743
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)