death penatly
Our legal system has no right to say who should die and who should not. And even though some may feel that others should die due to their prior actions, they have no say. In Many states where capital punishment is imposed the guilty are waived and the innocent sit on death row. In the past years, many felons have been executed, but a number of those were innocent. Since 1977, there have been 67 executions that have proved after the fact that the innocent are killed. At the time the government felt they were doing the right thing, but later were held accountable. What makes a justified punishment? Is it that the accused is made aware of their unlawful doing, or is it that they don't know what they did and the only pain they feel is the stressed caused by watching their lives tick away? It is hard to say, I hope that if the death penalty still stays in effect then it will become more accurate at pinpointing the criminals. How much does it cost to house a prison member compared to the cost of trial after trial and to be put on death row? These all take into effect if the death penalty is morally and economically right. When is it right to kill as a punishment? As Nathanson (2) says in An Eye for A
In conclusion, to this informative writing on why the death penalty is cruel, improper and immoral, my opinion still stands. I would like to see my money go toward locking up these Offenders. That way an appeal may be made in the future to find out if the guilty really are the guilty. Capital Punishment may be good for a situation down the road but today I feel that it is not necessary to kill a killer unless the system is flawless. If you kill the innocent legally you are no better than the killer at trial. I do not want my money being used to give a convict as many trials as he or she would like before being put on death row. I want it to go toward the building of new high- tech security prisons or more police on patrol. I don't want to waste it on paying for an attorney to protect this convicted murderer. worked without any flaws. "Would you favor the death penalty if it were administered by a perfect system?" (Black, Jr. 167). I would. Only the killers would be killed. to appeal, it comes to about 1.4 million dollars overall to execute one person. That is so much more expensive than paying $4,500 a year to imprison a convict who now has the The guilty have no choice in the death penalty or a sentence for life. All cases are different. Different judges, different juries and different scenarios, create a chance for personal discretion against or for the accused. If all the evidence is legitimate then the execution should continue. All of the cases sent to death row have to have different options for better ways to punish. With an execution, the guilty feels pain for less than a minute
Some common words found in the essay are:
Death Murder, Death Penalty, Punishing Death, Arthur Shawcross, Bill Rights, Capital Punishment, Black Jr, death penalty, Texas California, death row, capital punishment, eye eye, According Nathanson, Eye Eye, eye immorality punishing, immorality punishing, penalty wrong, cruel unusual, unusual punishment, rest life, punishing death, immorality punishing death, death penalty wrong, cruel unusual punishment, $4500 imprison convict,
Approximate Word count = 1092
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
