Argumentative Essay
The issue of whether we should allow state parks to allow ORVs (off road vehicles) has been widely debated in our community recently. It is an important issue because it concerns the fundamental moral and economic questions about the way we use our wildlife. A variety of different arguments have been put forward about this issue. This essay will consider arguments for allowing ORV in state parks. It will put forward recommendations for allowing ORV use in state parks, through the use of trail construction and maintenance techniques, while minimizing environmental impact. It is said that ORV operation causes erosion, damages waterways, and displaces wildlife in our state forest. However, instead of researching the impact of ORVs to the environment (as with research done about hiking, biking and horse back riding), opponents to ORV use want to band this activity all together. Indeed like any outdoor recreation participant (Fishing, Walking, Birding, Hiking, Climbing, Snow Shoeing, Skiing, Hunting, Camping, Backpacking, Biking, Canoeing, Horseback Riding, etc.), ORV operators will have impact on environmental conditions including the soils, vegetation, water, and wildlife. Thus the issue then become whether the impact from ORV
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
J1287 June, ORRRC July, Conversely ORV, , Indeed ORV, Environment Management, Terrain Vehicles, Horseback Riding, Till ORV, orv operators, Forest Furthermore, outdoor recreation, park forestry, orv operation, trail construction maintenance, impact orv, 5 miles, miles trails, hiking biking, induces emission park, environmental impact, 5 miles trails, orv parks, park forestry lands, emission park forestry,
Approximate Word count = 1086
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
