The text and context of this play where a little wild if you did not know what

I think some of the elements of the play helped the actors and some not. For instance I think those breaks where they would change the scene, were probably good for the actors because if they felt they were maybe losing it they had that little time to regroup themselves. I think the time in between scenes was more distracting to us as viewer, because a lot of the time people would start to talk and then the scene would start again. Overall I thought it was good but personally I did not really like it that much.

The character I am going to critically analyze is Sara. I think she was not really that realistic. She was so uneasy all the time I have never seen anybody that crazy. Everyone she talked to she was always cutting them off or something to that effect. I think she was definitely a part of the world of the play because it would be a pretty boring play if she was not in it. I think her goals as far as being a good teacher in the city were reached because she loved and it seemed the kids liked her. I do not really know if she wanted a relationship with Callie or what but if her goal was to get very close with Callie she also achieved that, at the ultimate price almost dying. I think her focus was pretty good. But the thing about theater is even if they mess up you can not be really sure. One

Some common words found in the essay are:
George Callie, Stop Kiss, Sara Callie, callie talked, arena theater, ,
Approximate Word count = 888
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)