Is Utilitarianism a Defensible

What are the main problems it faces?

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that seems to have lots of problems, but when analysing an ethical theory you must keep in mind that the main motive behind anyone’s moral values is that they believe them to be correct. So in this respect any ethical theory is defensible by one who believes in its virtues, even if you find the moral judgements made by it to be repugnant.

The main arguments against utilitarianism seem to come from the problems faced when trying to decide what the correct course of action in any given situation should be. There are difficulties with the calculations involved in the decision making process, the probable consequences and the measurement of happiness. There are what seem perverse ‘morally right’ outcomes that the theory dispenses (which can at times seem contradictory to what the generally accepted absolute values tell us, for instance killing is wrong) and blatant contradictions in the acts that the theory tells us to perform.

Utilitarianism deals with the probable consequences of any given action. Calculations of this type are obviously incredibly unreliable as you are dealing with unknowns. For exampl

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Utilitarianism Calculations, Bentham Bentham, , Rule Utilitarianism, course action, Nigel Warburton, negative utility, correct course action, correct course, ethical theory, probable consequences, Smart Williams, Utilitarianism Feldman, morally obliged, moral rules, absolute values, accepted moral, lower pleasures, Stuart Mill, course action utilitarian, truly heroic act, accepted moral rules, consider immediate effects,
Approximate Word count = 2436
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)