Over the years it has been an often heated and debated issue on whether the United States could have entered the war sooner and thus have saved many lives. To try to understand this we must look both at the people and government's point of view.

Just after war broke out in Europe, President Roosevelt hurriedly called his cabinet and military advisors together. There it was agreed that the United States stay neutral in these affairs. One of the reasons given was that unless America was directly threatened they had no reason to be involved. This reason was a valid one because it was the American policy to stay neutral in any affairs not having to do with them unless American soil was threatened directly. Thus the provisional neutrality act

Even if Roosevelt had wanted to do more in this European crisis (which he did not), there was a factor too often ignored by critics of American policy-American military weakness. When asked to evaluate how many troops were available if and when the United States would get involved, the army could only gather a mere one hundred thousand, when the French, Russian and Japanese armies numbered in millions. Its weapons dated from the first World War and were no match compared to the new artillery that Germany and its allies had. "American soldiers were more at home with the horse than with the tank" (Buchanan 273). The air force was just as bad if not worse. In September 1939 the Air Corps had only 800 combat aircrafts again compared with Germany's 3600 and Russia's 10,000. American military Aviation in 1938 was able to produce only 1,800, 300 less than Germany, and 1,400 less than Japan. Major Eisenhower, who was later Supreme commander of the Allied forces in the Second World War, complained that America was left with "only a shell of military establishment" (Fuller 234). As was evident to Roosevelt the United States military was in no way prepared to enter this European crisis.

Another aspect that we have to consider is the people's views and thought's regarding the United States going to war. After all let us not forget that the American government is there "for the people and by the people" and therefore the people's view did play a major role in this declaration of Neutrality. In one of Roosevelt's fireside chats he said "We shun political commitments which might entangle us In foreign wars...If we face the choice of profits or peace-this nation must answer, the nation will answer 'we choose peace' ", in which they did. A poll taken in 1939 revealed that ninety-four percent of the citizens did not want the United States to enter the war. The shock of World War I had still not left, and entering a new war, they felt, would be foolish. In the early stages of the war American Ambassador to London was quoted saying "It's the end of the world, the end of everything" (Fuller 261). As Buchanan notes in The Road To War, this growing "estrangement" from Europe was not mere selfishness. They were the values expressed by secretary of state, Cordel Hull: "a primary interest in peace with justice, in economic well-being with stability, and conditions of order under the law".

Some common words found in the essay are:
President Roosevelt, World War, Europe Asia, American Economy, Neutrality Roosevelt's, Cordel Hull, Third Reich, War II, Instead United, Roosevelt United, world war, president roosevelt, war ii, world war ii, american economy, entered war, united entered war, germany allies, united entered, avoid foreign entanglements, neutrality act, pearl harbor, security republic, earlier consequences worse, war earlier consequences,
Approximate Word count = 1619
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)