One of the most ambiguous fields of science is cloning. Initially not many were those who understood what is cloning, how it can be achieved and what will it result. By these means the majority of people were either indifferent or ignorant towards that matter. However on February 27, 1997, it was reported that scientists produced the first clone of an adult sheep, attracting international attention and raising questions on the morality of cloning. Within days, the public had called for ethics inquires and new laws banning cloning. Issues are now raised over the potentially destructive side of this scientific frontier. Many people are morally opposed to the possible consequences of women being able to give birth to themselves, or scientists seeking

An ethical basis for the rejection or acceptance of cloning in science can be based around several different theories of morality. Interestingly, those supporting a Utilitarian approach, seeking the greatest good for the greatest number, can be found on both sides of the issue. Some advocates of cloning argue that allowing society to benefit from cloned organs, for example, will outweigh the detrimental consequences of that may result from the abuse of cloning technology by a few scientists. At the same time, those adamantly against cloning argue that denying some individuals their right to a cloned child or organ is necessary to protect society from the negative affects this technology will have on humanity in general.

Others argue that cloning would be useful in solving the nature vs. nurture debate. Psychologists could monitor the effect of the environment on genetically identical subjects and discover how much of their personality was predetermined. The usefulness of this information is questionable however, as most scientists already agree that personality is influenced by both environmental and genetic factors and can study separated identical twins. The exact ratio of environmental to genetic influence on personality would remain hard to calculate.

Some common words found in the essay are:
Madeleine Nash, Advisory Commission, , Main Analysis, Kass Utilitarian, Fundamentals People, Waiting List, Book Dolly, Leon Kass, National Review, adult ewe, ban cloning, cloning argue, human cloning, argue cloning, technology cloning, cloning argue cloning, article cloning, cloning organs, cloned genes, human reproduction,
Approximate Word count = 1905
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)