of another persons, but what if the guilty one has no clue as to what the consequences hold? Someone who

has never had any person in their life to teach them the difference between right and wrong and is then rejected

by society because of its hideous appearance. What else is a creature such as this suppose to do except kill in

order to get revenge and justice for itself? Dracula is guilty of his crimes, but the beast is not.

Dracula is a very cruel, intelligent man that is guilty of his disgusting crimes.

According to the novel Dracula by Bram Stoker he is described basically as a human beast. The Translyvannian

people's conception about Count Dracula was described as the king of darkness, unpredictable savage and

furthermore a human feeder to repopulate his own existance throughout humanity. Dracula hurts dozens of

other people's lives by robbing them of their blood just so that he can have a good life. Dracu

abused him. When the old man's family discovers this creature talking to their grandfather they viciously beat

is the same scenerio in Frankenstein, with a strange twist. Victor Frankenstein had no right to play god and create

the difference between right and wrong. This is what the beast had never had. He never knew that killing another

become corrupt people. Everyone needs a role model to look up to so that they learn manners, the difference

was very wrong. Although the beast committed the murders, he should not be guilty because he was insane at

Some common words found in the essay are:
De Lacy's, Mina Harker, Lee Hayley, Gacy Jr, Character Comparison, De Lacey's, Count Dracula, Frankenstein Dracula, Victor Frankenstein, Mina Harker's, difference wrong, beast frankenstein, wrong beast, dracula guilty crimes, hideous looking, scared death, guilty crimes, beast dracula, victor beast, dracula guilty, teach difference, teach difference wrong,
Approximate Word count = 3925
Approximate Pages = 16 (250 words per page double spaced)