Before one can truly understand the reasons why this practice should be avoided, one's attention must first be brought to the beneficial stand on human cloning. The opposition argues that the benefits and advantages of this technology far exceed the dangers and risks. Some of

Each human life is unique, born of a miracle that reaches beyond laboratory science. I believe we must respect this profound gift and resist the temptation to replicate ourselves.

Yet there are several reasons for the delaying and hopefully ultimately banning human cloning research. Perhaps the utmost concern of all is that such practice is deemed immoral by millions worldwide, especially by widely known organizations like the UN, the Council of Europe, the European Parliament, the European Commission's ethical advisors and also the scientists at Roslin who cloned the infamous sheep Dolly. The key question is: should one respect a biological distinction or celebrate the God-given capacity to override it? Key concerns include psychological effects and physical risks, in the light of animal cloning experiments. It took 277 attempts and 29 implantations to produce one healthy Dolly. The understanding of the basic science of nuclear transfer is still elementary. No one knows how to guarantee that the cell reprogramming process would not lead to serious abnormalities in the offspring or damage to the mother. To render such risks into humans would be medically unethical. A leading researcher at Roslin has stated one c

Some common words found in the essay are:
, European Commission's, President Clinton, Leukemia Cancer, human cloning, human life, human cloning research, cloning research, unethical practice, animal cloning, potentially beneficial, creation human, process lead, cell organism,
Approximate Word count = 829
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)