Animal Testing
By 6:00 this evening, hundreds of animals will have had their eyes, skin, or gastrointestinal systems burned or destroyed to produce new versions of deodorant, hairspray, lipstick, and nail polish. Anesthesia is rarely administered, and these poor animals can suffer in agony for up to 168 hours. If they survive these tests, they are killed or forced to suffer through more testing. All this in the United States, where cruel and unusual punishment goes against the Constitution. I believe animal experimentation is a cruel and outdated practice because it is cruelty to animals, tests are not reliant, it wastes taxpayers' money, and there are many alternatives.Many tests are cruel to animals. Painful tests are administered, usually without any anesthesia, and left for a prolonged period, sometimes until all the test subjects are dead. One such test is the Draize test. This is an eye irritancy test usually performed on albino rabbits. They are the test subjects of choice because their eyes shed no tears, their eyes are clear, and their thin corneal membranes are extremely susceptible to injury. Six to eighteen rabbits are immobilized with only their heads protruding. A substance is placed in their eye and left with the eye
Some people may argue that while these tests are cruel and painful to animals, at least we will know what to do when someone gets the product in their eye, accidentally swallows it, or inhales the fumes. You may be surprised to learn that the tests actually have no input on a patient's treatment. Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D. says, "I know of no case in which an ophthalmologist used Draize data to assist the care of a patient." Rabbits' eyes are very different from humans' eyes, and substances that fail to damage rabbit eyes may prove to be very damaging to human eyes-or vice versa. Since results vary from laboratory to laboratory, even if a product is proved to be an irritant, it still can be sold. The acute toxicity tests prove what can kill an animal much smaller than a human. This test data also has no impact on the treatment of patients. Laboratory data can also be manipulated to prove anything the researchers want. Depending on the funding source, scientists have proven in animals that cigarettes cause cancer and that cigarettes do not cause cancer. Animal experiments are comparable to a jigsaw puzzle with extra pieces that do not fit. You have no idea which pieces do not belong, so you are left sorting out your puzzle time and again. Though you may feel animal research is necessary to cure certain diseases; medical history shows that key discoveries in heart disease, cancer, and diabetes have been made through clinical research, observation of patients, and human autopsies. Since animal research is unreliable and unnecessary, it only wastes taxpayers' money. clipped open. According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, "Many animals break their necks as they struggle to escape." They are examined for reactions to the substance at intervals ranging from one hour to a period of weeks. There is no attempt made to treat the rabbits. A
Some common words found in the essay are:
Kaufman MD, Treatment Animals, , Diffusion Method, According PETA, Carolina LSD, Eytex Skintex, Red Bioassay, Washington DC, Animals Visit, animal testing, tests cruel, tax dollars, animal research, irritancy test, test animals, animal testing cheaper, toxicity tests, acute toxicity, money alternatives, wastes taxpayers' money, taxpayers' money, cigarettes cause cancer, cruel outdated practice, acute toxicity tests,
Approximate Word count = 1262
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
