Polarization in the Political System

On Tuesday, November 14, 1995, in what has been perceived as

the years biggest non-event, the federal government shut down all

"non-essential" services due to what was, for all intents and

purposes, a game of national "chicken" between the House Speaker and

the President. And, at an estimated cost of 200 million dollars a day,

this dubious battle of dueling egos did not come cheap (Bradsher,

1995, p.16). Why do politicians find it almost congenitally

impossible to cooperate? What is it about politics and power that seem

to always put them at odds with good government? Indeed, is an

effective, well run government even possible given the current

adversarial relationship between our two main political parties? It

would seem that the exercise of power for its own sake, and a

competitive situation in which one side must always oppose the other

on any issue, is incompatible with the cooperation and compromise

necessary for the government to function. As the United States becomes

more extreme in its beliefs in general, group polarization and

competition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of goal attainment,

will lead to more "showdown" situations in which t

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Baron Graziano, Pete Wilson, Speaker President, Clinton Gingrich, Governor Wilson, Turque Thomas, Alfie Kohn, Ironically Wilson's, Contest Competition, Oklahoma City, pete wilson, political system, effects power tendency, negative effects power, extreme beliefs, newt gingrich, competitive situation, own sake, baron graziano 1991, polarization competition, treatment airplane flight, power own, power attempt gain, government policy, run government,
Approximate Word count = 2278
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)