June 4, 2001 issue of Time Magazine. It is an analysis of just how true to the facts the

recently released movie Pearl Harbor really was. The article attempts to prove its thesis

that while the movie does get some of the facts about Pearl Harbor right it gets too many

wrong to paint a cleat picture of the attack in the end. It tries to prove this by giving a few

examples of both small and large inaccuacies that kept the movie from giving a full view of

the attack and its effect on the nation. It also tries to show that the movie distorts the facts

of the attack on the base by adding in a common plot in war movies to help them sell to

the general public known as the love story. It argues that the story only helps to draw

away from the action of the attack and make the viewer less aware of the facts of the

attack. By using these two arguments, the author successfully proves that Pea

picture of the attack and the events leading up to it. The article backs up its statements

So, this article tries to use the innacuracies in the movie and its display of the love

description of the love triangle between to Army pilots and a nurse. While this story

finishes up by pointing out some minor inaccuracies about the presentation of the attack to

Some common words found in the essay are:
Pearl Harbor, Americans Japan, Harbor Attack, Robert Sullivan, President Roosevelt, Dorie Miller's, Pacific Fleet, Raymond Emory, pearl harbor, picture attack, Admiral Isoroku, , true picture, true picture attack, events leading, picture attack events, movie pearl, article tries, argument movie, leading article, tries movie, attack pearl harbor, pearl harbor article, attack pearl, events leading article,
Approximate Word count = 660
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)