Clone
The biological definition of a clone is an organism that has the same genetic information as another organism or organisms, where else cloning is any process in which production of a clone is successful. These are facts that many people don't want them to become a reality within our humanity. On the other hand, other people support and want produce human clones. Who's right? Should we not let science advance freely? Should we take the power of God and mess around with it? Cloning is a big issue these days; the opinion of our community comes into conflict when debating this serious issue. Amazingly, the first attempts at artificial cloning were as early as the beginning of this century. Adolph Eduard Driesch allowed the eggs of a sea urchin develop into the two-blastomere stage. Then he separated it by shaking it in a flask and allowing them to grow. The cells developed into dwarf sea urchins. Driesch could not explain his experiments and gave up embryology for philosophy (McKinnel, 1979). The first implantation of a nucleus into an egg cell occurred in 1952 by Robert Briggs and Thomas J. King in Philadelphia. They had transferred the nuclei of Leopard Frogs' eggs (McKinnel, 1979). The egg cells did not develop. Succ
From an Interactionist view we can see that in nature, and even in the lives of humans, clones are present. As stated earlier, a clone is an organism that has the same genetic information as another organism. From this we can say that cloning occurs with all plants, some insects, algae, unicellular organisms that conduct mitosis or binary fissions, and occasionally by all multicellular organisms, including humans. Monozygotic twins, or identical twins, are clones of each other. They have the same exact genetic information due to the division of an embryo early in development, which produces two identical embryos. About eight million identical twins are alive in the world, thus, already eight million human clones inhabit the world. At this point, I believe we should not use cloning. However, if we are to venture into cloning we must make many precautions. I think the best way to do this is to research the consequences. Yet, I do not believe cloning of animals is acceptable. Thus, I do not think we should conduct cloning experiment on animals. In summary, cloning is ethical, unless there is lack of respect for the lives of animals and humans, and for the ongoing inhabitation of life on earth. On the other hand, from the Conflict perspective, cloning does offer some negative affects it could have to life. The biggest problem with asexual reproduction is that genetic diversity becomes limited. If a population of organisms has the same genetic information, then the disease would wipe out the population. This is because not one organism has an advantage of fighting the disease over the other. The technique of nuclear transfer is also early in its developmental stages. Thus, errors are occurring when scientists carry out the procedure. For instance, it took 277 tries to produce Dolly, and Roslin scientists produced many lambs with abnormalities (Wilmut, 1997). This is the main reason science is holding out on cloning humans Moreover, cloning is supported by a group called Raelian. They believe cloning is the main core of their religion, thus it's their freedom of religion that encourages them to fight against anybody that opposes cloning. The Raelians are in constant battle to encourage the cloning of humans. They have com
Some common words found in the essay are:
Dolly Roslin, Fibrosis Kolata, Furthermore Roslin, Clonaid Clonaid, Dr Campbell, , Eduard Driesch, Megan Morag, John Gurdon, Dr Neal, nuclear transfer, genetic information, believe cloning, cloning humans, genetic information organism, kolata 3, june 1997, transferred nuclei, transfer provide, roslin scientists, own hands, nuclear transfer provide, clone organism genetic, organism genetic information,
Approximate Word count = 1515
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|