In regards to literature, in any form, I feel that only books promoting the death of a person or group of people should be censored. For example, if Adolf Hitler's book Min Konf was censored in the country of Germany, he may not have spread his message of the destruction of the Jewish people as easily and in such large numbers. On the other hand, if Upton Sinclair's Jungle, a story about an immigrant working in the Chicago factories, had been censored, there may not have been such a radical change in the labor plants across the United States. There have been many books that have been censored that probably should not have been because if we censor all the books that some people feel are t

Censorship can be used in a positive manner or negative way. Literature, in any form, should not be censored due to the fact that it can promote a major change, on the other hand movies do not stimulate such drastic changes so they can be censored without the fear of changing the content. The Internet is so large it cannot fully be censored, but limitations and verifications can limit the amount of unpleasant material that is viewed by minors. One thing is for sure censorship in some way shape or form is necessary in today's society.

oo violent, or too gruesome from people to read, then how will change ever occur? The sole reason some books are written is to promote a change in either government or in social practices; if they are censored then their points are emaciated and the books purpose is neglected.

The censorship of movies, in my view, is proper and should be continued, on the other hand censorship of music is inc

Some common words found in the essay are:
Sinclair's Jungle, Adolf Hitler, , Wide Web, Min Konf, Adolf Hitler's, web sites, sites created, literature form,
Approximate Word count = 627
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)