Lao-tzu vs. Machiavelli
Lao-tzu and Machiavelli are political philosophers writing in two different lands and two different times. Lao-tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher from 6th century BC, the author of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 years after Lao-tzu's time, author of Prince. They are both philosophers but have totally different perspective on how to be a good leader. On one hand Lao-tzu advises in his book Tao-te Ching, "If you want to be a great leader, you must learn to follow the Tao. Stop trying to control. Let go of fixed plans and concepts, and the world will govern itself". And Machiavelli on the other hand states in Prince, "He must, therefore, never raise his thought from this exercise of war, and in peacetime he must train himself more than in time of war"(page 36) While both philosopher's writing is instructive. Lao-tzu's advice issues from detached view of a universal ruler; Machiavelli's advice is very personal perhaps demanding. I think that both philosophers' idea will not work for today's world, due to the fact that modern world is not as perfect as Lao-tzu described in Tao-te Ching, and not as chaos as Machiavelli illustrated in Prince.
Perhaps Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's political view is totally opposite, at the end they all have a common goal is to create an ideal political system. The constitution among other things would not allow that sort of government today. The times have defiantly changed, but the need for the higher forms of thinking amongst society has not. Machiavelli wrote "A prince, therefore, must not have any other object nor any other thought, nor must he take anything as his profession but war, its discipline; because that is the only profession which befits one who commands;" He discussed that a Prince's duty is war and only war. This lead to the second issue, war, which existed as long as the existence of human kind, as I am writing this essay there are still wars going on all over the world. According to Machiavelli war should be the only thing on a prince's mind, because if a prince give more thought to personal luxuries than war he could lose his state and position. Lao-tzu states in Tao-te Ching "The master doesn't try to be powerful; thus he is truly powerful. The ordinary man keeps reaching for power; thus he never has enough." I have to disagree with both philosophers' idea, because I think that war can be looked at a
Some common words found in the essay are:
Rifle Association, Tao-te Ching, Duke Milan, Tao Stop, Lao-tzu Machiavelli's, Machiavelli Italian, Lao-tzu Machiavelli, Lao-tzu Machivelli's, Desert Storm, According Machiavelli, gun control, tao-te ching, world war fought, world war, weapon tools, war fought, lives war, today's world, wrote prince, philosophers' idea, protect themselves, machiavelli wrote prince,
Approximate Word count = 825
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
