Many people, both pro-gun and pro-gun control talk about freedom all

the time but nobody has actually taught about it critically and apply it in the

debate of gun control policies in our society. Pro-gun people believe that the

implementation of gun-control policies is an infringement on human

freedom. Human freedom? 'Very interesting'. We leave in a democratic

society and when we think of democracy, what comes in mind is

government of the people. Therefore decisions are made based on a majority

vote or opinion. Some issues need not be debated or contested in my

opinion. Strict gun-control policies are one of those. We should look around

us and see what 250 millions guns in American streets has done to us, then

take action. Any society that does not implement gun-control policies has

opened a wide door for societal violence and random murders. When the

citizens of nation no longer feel very free to move around at certain time of

the day because of the fear of being gunned down by some lunatic with a

gun, that is what I call infringement of human freedom.

What are the benefits of allowing peo

sense. With 250 million guns in the USA, it has not worked rather we have

know what happened next but one thing I know for sure today, is that my

ourselves, why is it that other societies like Great Britain, Australia, Japan

etc who have stricter gun-control policies have far less gun crimes. It is a

16-year-old who had stolen his father's pistol and went robbing the

Some common words found in the essay are:
, Brief February, Australia Japan, gun-control policies, human freedom, own guns, people own guns, infringement human freedom, allowed own, people own, guns costs, infringement human,
Approximate Word count = 854
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)