The moral argument is the argument that proves God's existence using the existence of absolute morality. To make the moral argument even believable we would have to prove that absolute morality exists. First of all we must define morality; morality is a standard of right or wrong. To take morality a step further, there is absolute morality. Absolute morality is a law that pertains to all people, is universal and timeless; all people perceive it, and are bound to it.

The common foundation for absolute morality is that it is universal. For example, everyone knows murder is wrong; if one kills someone he feels guilty, proving an absolute morality. These laws are innate, meaning you know them from birth.

These standards of right and wrong are revealed through conduct and conversation. For example, when one sees starving children or people, they feel a need to help them, and they say that it itsn't right for them to be treated like that. Also if a complete stranger walked into your house and picked up your television and started walking out, more than likely you 'd get up and say something like, "Hey, stop that!  That is my TV."  What you are doing in that

Some people say that there is no absolute morality, but those people are just proving that there is; it is called a self-contradiction. When they say there are no absolutes, they are making an absolute, proving there are absolutes.

If there are absolute morals than there had to be someone who created them. If one found a watch on the beach one wouldn't assume that over time the ocean waves carved out all the machinery for the watch and somehow they just ended up together. No, you would think someone made this, and it would be verified by the "Made in the USA" mark on the back.

scenario is appealing to a universal moral law.  You assume it is an understood standard for all people to follow, a principle of not taking things that are not theirs. If this person responded by saying, "So what?", you would probably think that person was crazy. It would be strange if someone did not understand certain moral values. This is because we assume there is a universal moral law.

The moral law governs all persons, everywhere, at all times. However people are free-will agents. When people violate the moral law, they feel deserving of some type of punishment. They feel accountable or guilty. Why? Because someone greater than them has established this absolute law and has written it on their hearts.

For someone to establish morals they would have to be moral. If the establisher of the speed limit

Some common words found in the essay are:
Moral Argument, God America, Creator God, absolute morality, moral law, moral argument, societies vary, speed limit, absolute morality people, killing child wrong, moral establisher speed, establisher speed, established law, morality people, speed limits, killing child,
Approximate Word count = 948
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)