Should all Convicted Criminals have their DNA Recorded?
Once convicted criminals have their DNA fingerprints in CrimTrac's database, police are able to identify them faster as suspects, if they re-offend, which saves investigation time. When confronted with DNA evidence, guilty suspects may be more likely to confess and plead guilty, also saving police time and reducing court costs. The DNA database gives Australian police a tool to increase the closure rate of not only serious offences but also high volume crimes such as burglaries. As many crimes are solved more rapidly, the police will be free to investigate other crimes that are outstanding. As more crimes are investigated and solved, Australia will become a safer place to live. This is a major argument for all people convicted of a crime to have their DNA fingerprints stored on the DNA database.However, despite the present success of DNA databases such as CrimTrac, concerns are raised about the ethics presently involved, and also, the future repercussions of such a database being in existence. One present concern is that with so many samples being collated, there is a remote chanc
Concerns being raised about the future repercussions of the convicted criminal's DNA fingerprint databases and their source samples are primarily focused on the possible non-forensic uses. Due to the fact that DNA can be collected so conveniently from minute cells, it is a possibility that in the future, everyone could have their DNA fingerprints recorded on a database whether they like or not. Organisations such as insurance companies, employers, schools, adoption agencies, and many others could gain access to those files on a "need to know" basis or "in the public interest." A person could be turned down for jobs, insurance, adoption, health care, and other social services and benefits on the basis of information contained in his or her DNA profile, such as genetic disease, heritage, or someone else's idea of a genetic "flaw." Storing convicted criminals DNA fingerprints on a database could just be the first step into storing everyone's DNA fingerprints on computers, and so it could be argued that no-one, not even convicted criminals should have such a record stored to prevent thi
Some common words found in the essay are:
, Due DNA, DNA Concerns, convicted criminals, dna fingerprints, dna database, concerns raised, criminals dna fingerprints, convicted criminals dna, dna fingerprint databases, fingerprint databases, future dna, crime scene, future repercussions, dna evidence, dna fingerprint,
Approximate Word count = 733
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
