Ethics and Leaded Gas
This is a comparative study based on articles written in the New York Times and The Nation regarding the manufacture of Monokote by the W. R. Grace Corporation and tetraethyl lead (TEL) by the Ethyl Corporation. Although dissimilar products, they used similar business strategies to promote their product’s use. While the economic reasons for the production of their products satisfied a “need” and provided substantial “profit”, each company and their supporting industries implemented business strategies which put the public health at risk. One business strategy, named the Kehoe Rule, was successfully applied to preserve the self-interests of these two U. S. companies. Consequently, the public’s health has been kept at risk for the Kehoe Rule remains a viable business strategy today. More importantly, our expanding world economy magnifies the issues concerning public health. As the automotive industry developed in the early 1900s several events took place creating “leaded gasoline”. Initially alcohol was the fuel of choice. It was known to produce high engine compression (power) with the benefits of being a renewable resource, non-toxic, and emitting no smoke or disagreeable od
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Kehoe Rule, Dr Smiths, Grace Corporation, TEL Monokote, Wall Street, Kehoe Rules, Silent Treatment, Third World, Monokote Grace, Milton Friedmans, kehoe rule, health risk, lead industry, tetraethyl lead, monokote grace, grace corporation, publics health, asbestos content, public health, business strategy, grace stayed course, dr smiths research, grace claimed tremolite, safe level exposure, tetraethyl lead tel,
Approximate Word count = 2539
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
