Roman Pantomime
In assessment of the origins and nature of pantomime in ancient Rome, one will clearly see that the latter two factors are wide and varied. This is due to the collaborative nature of the art as a whole. With a close examination of archaeological, textual and representational evidence one will gain a precise understanding of how the origins, nature and type of audience of the pantomime are interrelated. One will additionally gain inisight into the widespread popularity of pantomime despite a general dislike towards drama in ancient Rome. Before one can begin to consider the origins of Roman pantomime, one must have a clear understanding of the nature of pantomime. This is due to the fact that the nature of the art is in most cases, directly related to its origins. Once the nature of the art has been established, one will clearly see the connection between the latter and it’s origins. The term pantomime, which was, introduced by the Italian Greeks referrs to the actor. The mimer of everything. The pantomime was considered a solo performer who wore a mask, and expressed himself through dance, but did not sing. Rather, a musical group or chorus accompanied the pantomime. This type of performance is usual
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Metellus Domitius, Lesbonax Mytilene, Syrian Alexandrian, Venus Furys, Verses Livy, , Hartnoll Roman, Italian Greeks, Etruria Romans, Lucian Samosata, roman pantomime, nature art, origins roman pantomime, nature pantomime, origins roman, origins pantomime, forms drama, fescennine verses, art pantomime, greek myths, origins nature, archaeological textual representational, examination archaeological textual, result nature pantomime, textual representational evidence,
Approximate Word count = 2173
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
