The journal article, titled "It's over, Debbie," talks about a dramatic and emotional first person account of euthanasia. The legislative initiative represents a group of Californians who tried to make euthanasia legal, through the referendum process. The initiative, called the California Humane and Dignified Death Act, required 450,000 public signatures, but only garnered 130,000. The third setting was the public policy on euthanasia in the Netherlands. It talks about how euthanasia is not technically illegal. It says that although killing and murder is illegal, physicians who perform euthanasia on patients will not be punished. An estimated 5,000 to 10,000 patients get euthanized annually in the Netherlands.

They authors define euthanasia as: "The deliberate action of a physician to terminate the life of a patient." Proponents argue that "patients whose illnesses cause them unbearable suffering should be permitted to end their distress by having a physician p

By approaching euthanasia on three fronts, the authors deliver a well-rounded argument that comes from separate points of view. The first setting, the journal article, takes on a more emotional approach. Although it doesn't directly say much about the article, it emphasizes the humanity and emotions behind euthanasia. One of the other settings was the legislative initiative. This was more of a legal approach, coming not from the government, but by a group of citizens who tried to make euthanasia legal. Talking about this showed that the movement to make euthanasia legal is growing, and that many people favor it. The third setting concerned public policy in the Netherlands. This showed to the reader that there are already parts of the world that have implemented policies on euthanasia, and that in some places it is widely practiced. After talking about these three examples, the authors state that they "urge physicians to consider some reasons for resisting the move toward euthanasia."

erform euthanasia." They also argue that one of the rights of the patient is to request and to receive euthanasia. After stating the two major claims of the proponents, the author's rebuttal that "the public good served by the prohibition of euthanasia outweighs the private interests of the persons requesting it."

Overall, these authors approached and debated this topic very well. Since euthanasia is such a widespread controversy, it is extremely hard to write about without just coming out and saying that: "I'M RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG!" Dr. Singer and Dr. Siegler controlled their personal views very skillfully by picking apart both sides o

Some common words found in the essay are:
Dr Siegler, Death Act, Critical Analysis, Brief Summary, It's Debbie, public policy, Dr Singer, singer dr siegler, dr singer dr, Singer Dr, euthanasia legal, legislative initiative, singer dr, dying patients, journal article, dr siegler, dr singer, tried euthanasia legal, deliberate action physician, life patient, physician terminate, action physician terminate,
Approximate Word count = 1110
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)