In order for an individual to take a stand on whether or not he or she thinks the testing of cloning human beings should be banned or allowed to continue, we should look at both sides of the argument. The basic process of cloning itself is explained as a method whereby stem cells are extracted from a part of the human body and placed into a fertilized egg where they reproduce in to multiple cells carrying on the same traits of the individual they were extracted from. Cloning humans is indeed an extremely broad topic, which is, without a doubt, controversial to numerous groups of people and organizations. In this argument, however, the attempt will be to focus on the ideas of those who favor cloning for family and scientific reasons and those who do not favor cloning for moral and scientific reasons. Many of those families that have lost their loved ones feel that they have an ethical right to bring back those lost ones if by any means possible. The people who refute their arguments are those who fall under the direct faith of the religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, who do not permit the cloning of human beings due to Gods will. S

Cloneaid. " The Raelian Religion." < http://www.cloneaid.com >

(Oct 21st, 20001)

Some common words found in the essay are:
Cloning Foundation, Aaron Hawley, Scientific Prosperity, Gorman Magazine, Gods Scientists, Uncloned America, Paul II, Advisory Commission, cloning human, human cloning, Easier Magazine, Scientific American, loved ones, favor cloning, cloning foundation, uncloned america, human cloning future, defective genes, oct 21st, cloning moral, clones clones, favor cloning moral, human cloning foundation,
Approximate Word count = 1377
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)