USA vs Irac
Should the US attack Iraq ? some say yes and others say no, in this essay I will look at both sides. The first side of this argument I will look at is why America should attack Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein is back with avengeance, and his threats of world destruction aren't to be taken lightly. The United States tried unsuccessfully to target him during the Gulf War in February 1991, however, they confidently expected the Iraq leader to be gone within months. Now, seven years later Saddam has shown a remarkable ability to survive and to rebuild his military to almost its peak potential and the US are threatening to lead air strikes over weapons inspections. Iraq is able to produce chemical and biological weapons within weeks, a long-range missile within a year and a nuclear weapon in five years. It would also be enough time to make up 350 litres of Anthrax a week, enough for two missile warheads, or enough to kill hundreds of thousands of people. The United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) has verified and destroyed 817 missiles, 30 warheads, 75 launchers and launch pads, 38, 537 munitions and 690 tonnes of
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Dr Germ, War February, Middle East, UN Secretary, Saddam Hussein, Rihab Taha, Commission UNSCOM, Atta Iraqi, Iraq American, League March, attack iraq, dr germ, saddam hussein, iraq increase, attack iraq increase, middle east, argument america attack, arab countries, litres anthrax, gulf war, increase anti-american sentiment, air strikes, tonnes chemical-weapons agents, iraq increase anti-american, chemical-weapons agents,
Approximate Word count = 785
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
