Alien and Seditions Acts DBQ
"The debate over the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 revealed bitter controversies on a number of issues. Discuss the issues and explain why these controversies developed."Under the threat of war with France, Congress in 1798 passed four laws in an effort to strengthen the Federal government, known collectively as the Alien and Sedition Acts. It produced a way for the Federalists to revolt against Democratic-Republican opposition and to increase power for themselves. These acts did not permit anyone to criticize the government at all, through writing, or any other shape, form, or fashion. It also extended the time to become an American citizen, since the Federalists believed that most of the foreigners would become Democratic-Republicans. These two political parties centered around domestic and foreign policy differences, reached their highest point of disagreement upon the passage of the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1978, in purpose that one party would remain in control by limiting the power and growth of the other party. In 1789, the Minister to France, Thomas Jefferson, to Francis Hopkinson of Pennsylvania, protested that "I am not of the party of the Federalists. But I am much farther from that of the Anti-federalists" (
As the debate over federal authority and states' rights continued on, the parties continued to attack one another. In late 1798 and early 1799, D. M. Erkshire, noticed the ferociousness of the attacks. "...they think nothing of wishing each other destroyed each Party openly descanting upon the probability of its becoming a matter of necessity to extirpate the opponent one...Politics has so divided men and so far do they carry it that it seldom happens that a person of one way of thinking visits any body in the opposite" (Document S). The defaming attacks by both sides on each other were extremely harsh. Thus, the debate over the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 revealed bitter controversies on a number of issues that had been developing since the penning of the Constitution. The writers of the document knew that over time the needs of the nation and its people would change, and therefore provided for its amendment. But by not expressly delegating powers to specific organizations, whether the federal government, state governments, or the people themselves, they inadvertently created a major problem, as attested by the passing of the Alien and Sedition Acts. Document C). However, the situation was so controversial that he could not help but to chose a side. In 1795, Jefferson wrote to a congressman from Virginia, William Giles, that he "held it honorable to take a firm and decided part" (Document F). The group he sided with was the Democratic-Republicans, who favored a strict interpretation. Thomas Jefferson, the Democratic-Republican's leader, argued that all powers not covered by the Constitution belonged to the States. The basis for his argument was the old English "Compact theory." This theory stated that various individuals, in this case the states, join together in a formal agreement of government. Since the states had drawn up the contract and given power to the federal government, it should be up to them to decide who received the power, not the body they created. This led to a debate over interpretation that sparked one of the first
Some common words found in the essay are:
Sedition Acts, Sedition Act, Document Federalist, Document Hamilton, House Representatives, Alien Act, English Compact, President Washington, Washington Hamilton, French Directoryevinces, sedition acts, alien sedition, federal government, alien sedition acts, sedition act, house representatives, speech house representatives, speech house, thomas jefferson, bitter controversies issues, strengthen federal, republican congressman, central government, revealed bitter controversies, strengthen federal government,
Approximate Word count = 1389
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|