Gladiator vs Hannibal
Ridley Scott, being contemporary and innovative is one of many film directors who have a certain style that is ever present throughout their films. Gladiator and Hannibal two of Scott's best movies do not share plot summary yet they encompass similar techniques to achieve their desired look. In two different scenes Scott incorporates similar lighting, camera movement, angles and music to tell the stories of both the characters of Maximus and Clarise. This work looks at each of the techniques used in the four scenes and how they compare and contrast. Scott is considered one the best directors around and one who expresses his ideas through not only the plot but also in the way the plot takes place. He enjoys using many different kind of camera angles especially cross cutting and quick cutting. Crosscutting is when in a scene the camera moves back and forth over the shoulder of tow people who are engaging in a conversation or some sort of action. Scott uses this in his films because he likes to use different ideas or themes that involve close action. Quick cutting, which is mostly noticeable in Gladiator, is when there is a lot of action in one scene and the camera moves back and forth really quickly in order to catch all of th
There were also some differences between the two scenes that help in shaping the different kinds of plot summaries. In Gladiator, the scenes are very bright and red colored. This is symbolic because Maximus' family has just died which symbolizes blood shed. The red also symbolizes passion, which Maximus is going to have to have if he wants to seek revenge for whoever has committed these crimes against his family. In Hannibal, the background is very dark and mysterious. This is good because Clarise who has just been shot really has no idea where they are going. She is out of it and in a way blacked out which explains the background color. The one thing that I do not understand is the shadow that was cast over Clarise. The one thing that I came up with was that Hannibal was following and examining her every move. So in a sense he was like a shadow like figure in her life. Another difference was that there was no real flashback in Hannibal but rather it was Clairse fading in and out of consciousness, which was symbolic because she had just been shot, and she was wondering where she was and or going. In Gladiator, it was a mere flashback of his past and memories but still accomplished the same idea of a passage of time. Hannibal is the third story of the Hannibal Lecter series begins in Florence, Italy where Hannibal has found refuge after escaping authorities in America. His identity is discovered by a police officer that turns over his whereabouts to, and is rewarded by, Mason Verger who is a previous patient and victim of Lecter. Meanwhile, the new and improved Agent Starling is hot on his trail. In the end, Sterling finally tracks down Lecter and eventually brings his character to justice. Although this movie did not win any awards for picture, in my opinion the film was one of great quality and I thoroughly en
Some common words found in the essay are:
Agent Starling, Maximus Clarise, Clarise Maximus, Gladiator Maximus, Acadamy Award, Coliseum Romans, Hannibal Scott's, Caesar Caesar's, Hannibal Clairse, Italy Hannibal, quick cutting, scene camera moves, picture goes forth, passage hannibal, shadow cast, hannibal car, hannibal trees, family scene, camera moves, trees background, family scene quick, camera moves forth, characters scene, flashback hannibal,
Approximate Word count = 1238
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|