In this entertaining view of animal rights, Regan defends his position by criticizing contractarian views of morality, which deny that non human animals can have rights. According to him contractarianism, states you have no duty directly to your dog or any other animal, not even the duty not to cause them pain. Regan states that his duty not to hurt them is

Regan's intended audience is for anyone with an animal or more important any one who loves animals. His purpose in writing is to illustrate the many view of animal right and to share his option on the subject by siding with the rights view. With our liberated and understanding society you can look at animal rights in a whole new perspective. All animals have rights in their own way, and we can continue to do what we are doing, but, go about it in a more human way.

Regan goes on to support his opinion by discussing and explaining the rights view, as he likes to call it. He explains that the rights view is rationally more moral, by every means possible. It states that the animals who have inherent value should be treated as such with more kindness and care, like you would a human being. Not every human meets certain rights such as intelligence or autonom

Some common words found in the essay are:
Tom Regan, animal rights, rights view, animals rights, view animal, inherent value, lives inherent,
Approximate Word count = 583
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)