Defendants breif on negligence
v. ) IN THE MOCK TRIAL COURT OF AUSTRALIAPLAINTIFF ESTATE OF DORIS DAYLIGHT The court should compensate Mrs. Daylights Estate for: 2. Mrs. Daylight’s unborn child becoming HIV positive, 3. The foreseeable result of the plaintiff’s alleged actions, her inevitable premature death 4. Pain and suffering, which she will endue in the brief period before her death and her child’s death and 5. Exemplary damages awarded to discourage this type of alleged negligence. The tort of negligence is doing or failing to do something, which involves conduct, which falls below the standard regarded as normal or desirable by the community . The elements which must be proven before a defendant can be found liable for negligence are: 1. The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care, 2. The defendant breached this duty of care, and 3. This breach of the duty of care caused the plaintiffs injury. The first element of negligence is that the defendant owed a duty of reasonable care to the pl
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Dr Egglehead, Becoming HIV, Daylight Doriss, Family Court, Doris Daylights, Rock Hard, Doris Rocks, duty care, Doris Daylight, HIV Rock, Doris Eggleheads, breach duty, dr egglehead, doris daylight, rock hard, element negligence, estate doris daylight, estate doris, breach duty care, hiv positive, blatant breach duty, unborn child, breached duty care, exemplary damages, proximate cause plaintiffs,
Approximate Word count = 1374
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|