Ethics
In the late sixty's, pushed by competition, the Ford Motor Company made a decision to design a new subcompact car, the Pinto. Their main goal was to build a car that would be below 2,000 pounds and sell for less than 2,000 dollars. They shortened the time for preproduction testing and development from forty-three months to a little over two years that revealed the gas tank had been put in an unsafe position close to the rear bumper. When the Ford Company crash tested the Pinto it revealed that there was a possibility of the fuel tank being punctured in an accident, and the spray sparks could ignite gasoline and set the vehicle on fire. Despite that the company went on with production of the Pinto as designed, since it "met all applicable federal safety standards." Since 1972 nearly fifty-four persons had died in accidents involving Pinto fires and many had been severely burnt. Among these people were Mrs. Lilly Gray, who died a few days after an accident, and Richard Grimshaw, who survived the accident, but was severely burnt
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Ford Company, Kohlbergs Preconventional, Motor Company, Respect Autonomy, Principle Utility, Richard Grimshaw, , ford company, Lilly Gray, management ford, human life, morally responsible, Ford Companys, Law Autonomy, ford company morally, persons involved, level moral, unsafe car, potentially unsafe, potentially unsafe car, decisions actions, company morally responsible, car bring, level moral development, management ford company,
Approximate Word count = 705
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
