Analysis of the Crito
The purpose of “Crito” seems intended to exhibit the character of Socrates in one light only, not as the philosopher, fulfilling a divine mission and trusting in the will of Heaven, but simply as the good citizen, who, having been unjustly condemned is willing to give up his life in obedience to the laws of the State. The main argument that seems to entail the discussion between Crito and Socrates is the opinion of the majority on Socrates’ fate. In the “Crito” Socrates states, “Why should we care so much for what the majority think?” (Plato 45) Socrates believes that we should not care what the majority thinks because those who are reasonable people will understand. However, Crito’s counter-argument to this is that the majority can cause great harm; therefore we should care what they think. Socrates further goes on to say the majority acts haphazardly; therefore, they cannot do great good or great harm (Plato 45). Crito says that "the opinion of the many" would judge us wrong if we didn't help you (and anyone in your position would agree that you ought to escape). Socrates notes that some opinion is right and some opinion is wrong. It is not simply a matter of mere opinion, but of correct opinion. The authority in this c
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Crito Socrates, Athens Socrates, Populum Fallacy, Vietnam Socrates, , North Vietnamese, South Vietnamese, Encyclopedia Britannica, Dinh Diem, South Vietnam, socrates believes, reasonable people, opinion majority, believe socrates, south vietnam, majority socrates, athens 70, socrates position, laws athens, crito socrates, trying improve one's, laws athens 70, opinion majority socrates, lived laws athens,
Approximate Word count = 1423
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
