99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Censorship and the Communications Decency Act

Censorship and the Communications Decency Act

Censorship: suppression of words, images, or ideas that are "offensive". Offensive: giving painful or unpleasant situations.

These two words can easily be looked up and defined when having to use them in a paper, but trying to describe what should be censored and what is offensive is a daunting task. There have always been huge debates over censorship that aims at the First amendment and whether it is constitutional for a group of people to decide what is right for the people.

Even before World War I, there were attacks on what was considered offensive material. "Anthony Comstock, head of the Society for the Suppression of Vice, passed the first censorship law in 1873. The law forbade the mailing of anything, in his opinion, lewd, obscene or indecent." (Zelezny, 453) The controversy over censorship raged feverishly after WWI and until the Tariff Act of 1930, many literary classics were not allowed into the United States because of the obscenity contained in them. Over a 15-year period, which began in 1957, the Supreme Court made relaxed restrictions on "obscene" material.

Supreme Court decisions struck down many obscenity statues, states responded by enacting laws prohibiting


There are other cases that have pushed the CDA envelope. Joe Shea, the editor of American Reporter, challenged the law, in the District Court in New York, by using the freedom of the press angle in April 1996; the case was never tried due to the CDA being found unconstitutional.

The Communications Decency Act attempted to regulate boundaries by censoring the Internet and defining what "offensive" was. This act will never not face scrutiny because it does the one thing that Americans pride themselves on the First Amendment and the stipulation that "Congress shall make no law...abridging freedom of speech, or of the press."

On June 12, 1996, a three-judge court in Philadelphia ruled in favor of ACLU stating that the CDA was an unconstitutional abridgment of rights protected by the First and Fifth Amendments. A few months passed and on June 26 by a 7-2 vote, the United States Supreme Court affirmed that the CDA violated the First Amendment's guarantee to freedom of speech. The government filed for an appeal to the Supreme Court on September 29, 1996 and the ACLU filed a rebuttal to the appeal on October 31st. Finally, on March 19th, 1997, both sides of the case were presented in front of nine justices and it was determined that the Internet was granted the highest level of First Amendment protection. This case was distinguished from the Pacifica case where the issue was a FCC order, which applied to radio, that was protected under the First Amendment.

The invention of the Internet presents another set of issues. It is a method of public communication and a source of information that is aimed and controlled by the government. Many different types of creative works are found on the Internet, some of which people would find in their own eyes "offensive". Now, in order to decrease the amount of obscene material on the Internet, the government began passing laws to censor this medium. Obscenity can be banned on the Internet, just as any other medium, and in the 1996 case of the United States v. Thomas, a husband and wife began operating a bulletin board system from their home. "The system included e-mail's, chat lines, public messages, and photo files that subscribers could download to their own computers" (Zelenzy, 505). The viewers that didn't subscribe would receive a screen that read "Welcome to AABBS, the Nastiest Place on Earth." This eventually convicted the Thomas' of violating the fede

Some common words found in the essay are:
Supreme Court, President Clinton, FCC Commissioners, Decency Act, Reno ACLU, Act Censorship, Wide Web, United Thomas, Miller Test, Finally March, supreme court, communications decency, communications decency act, decency act, offensive material, reno aclu, reform act 1996, obscene material, community standards, cda law, obscene offensive, freedom speech, supreme court ruled,
Approximate Word count = 1629
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Censorship and the Communications Decency Act

censorship 21049 words
internet censorship1045 words
Decency Act1940 words
Censorship950 words
Soul Selling: A Look Into Music Censorship2157 words

Look at even more essays on Censorship and the Communications Decency Act
More Politics Essays

Professional Papers:
Internet Censorship3849 words
Interactive computing2160 words
Personal Computer Use1357 words
History and Uses of the Internet2123 words
The Internet and Sexual Content6631 words
Global Entertainment2355 words
Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers