Mandatory Curfews Arguement

A detailed Summary of Mandatory Curfews Arguement

What right does an authority figure have to punish individuals of good behavior? When a

teenager is behaving, why should they be punished? Mandatory curfews are seen as

punishments for those who are behaving. The decision of what a teenager can handle,

should be made judging on the individual, not on society as a whole. This trustworthiness

in a teenager should not be taken away by the government. It should be a decision made

by the guardians of the young individual because only they realize the dependability of

the teenager. Mandatory curfews should not be used to regulate juvenile behavior.

The restrictions of a mandatory curfew can not be assigned to teenagers. The

government can not determine the restrictions that should apply

who may work late hours. Their concern is for the teenagers causing problems. Rules

kids who are not causing trouble. Instead, this time should be used controlling the

out passed the mandatory curfew. They have more important obligations than to monitor

restrictions should be based on the circumstances and determined by the guardian.

the individual's responsibility. The government can not decide what is best for every

The parents should always have the authority in a parent-child relationship. They

social choice made by the general public. A parent extending a curfew because of gained

Approximate Word count = 504
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)

Category: Politics

join now Save Paper

Saved Paper

Save your papers so you can locate them quickly!

"Thank You So Much!!! You have saved me once again!!!"
Jack M.
"With so many papers to chose from, I was able to get ideas to help me with all of my classes. Thank You!"
Brian P.
"I've used this site for the last 3 years to help me come up with ideas for my papers."
Sara J.
"I use this site every week to help me write my own papers!"
Rachel W.
"I love this site!!!"
Marie N.