Kohlberg's stages of theory, I think, are quite accurate descriptions of how a person may judge a moral dilemma. I don't, however, think that a person can be only one stage for every single moral dilemma. I think that the stages can fluctuate within a person and that they may combine stages to reach a decision. Also, I think that as one gets older the stages progress toward a higher-level one, but I think that a person no matter how old can still hold true to any stage that they deem best.

ined more than one stage to arrive at a solution.

When I first read Kohlberg's theory I reasoned myself to be at stage six. I thought that I made decisions on morals through my own principals and not the law. Then I read that most adults are at the stages three o

Some common words found in the essay are:
, stage six, moral dilemma, person stage, moral dilemma don't, don't person stage, dilemma don't person, moral development, stages fluctuate, kohlberg's stages, dilemma don't, situations situation, don't person,
Approximate Word count = 516
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)