Marcus Brutus uses a technique in his speech in which he tries to tell the people that having Ceasar killed was in their best interest. Brutus asks the crowd, "Had you rather Ceasar were living, and die all slaves, than that Ceasar were dead, to live

I think Brutus's technique of persuasion was best even though in the end it didn't win the crowd. Anytime someone tells me about something or is trying to persuade me to get their product or idea I'm automatically sold when they give me a couple of reasons why I would benefit from it their product or idea. Though Antony's speech was pretty good and did win the crowd over in the end I think I would have been one of those few that went with Brutus. In their speeches they both went with a kind of passive approach and really didn't us much force when talking to the plebians. Though Brutus said he was more on plebians side and that he did love Ceasar greatly he was really just in it for himself. Antony on the other hand really was for the people and avenging Ceasars death with his speech.

The man V.S. man conflict was eventually settled after Antony won the crowd and Brutus was put to death. Who was really right

Some common words found in the essay are:
Alls Antony, Marcus Brutus, Brutus Ceasar, Marcus Antonius, Shakespeare VS, Julius Ceasar, Marcus Brutus's, William Shakespeare, technique persuasion, March Antony, telling people, marcus antonius, brutus's technique, marcus brutus, reversed psychology, people ceasar, Julius Ceasars, people ceasar killed, antonius marcus, william shakespeare, trying persuade, marcus antonius marcus, telling people ceasar, example brutus's technique, brutus's technique persuasion,
Approximate Word count = 620
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)