Humanitarianism and Universalism
In the article “Women and Cultural Universals,” Martha Nussbaum discusses about basic human capabilities that should be granted to every human being regardless of their sex, race, or religion. However, a problem arises with reaching such basic rights since every nation has their own definition of this matter. In order for these basic human capabilities to be accepted throughout the world, nations ought to reach a generalized consensus on what rights an average human should have, rights that ought to transcend cultural traditions and religious “barriers.” All in all, the point of Nussbaum’s basic human capabilities list is to “put forward something that people from many different traditions, with many different fuller conceptions of good, can agree on, as the necessary basis for pursuing their good life” (462). There is a similarity of this ideology with Mary Kaldor’s global humanitarian approach. Even though both ideologies attempt to stabilize certain situations in troubled nations, they have different approaches. Nussbaum believes that her list of basic human capabilities should be implemented into every nation, especially those nations that are currently violating the rights of their inh
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Western Eastern, Mary Kaldors, Martha Nussbaum, According Nussbaum, War II, Pearl Harbor, human capabilities, basic human, basic human capabilities, Eastern Western, humanitarian approach, capabilities list, human rights, human capabilities list, global humanitarian approach, global humanitarian, nussbaums list, Christianity Judaism, list basic, list basic human, Humanitarianism Universalism, kaldors global humanitarian, implemented nation, throughout world,
Approximate Word count = 1634
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
