I first warn you, however, that what I am about to say is entirely theoretical. I believe that if the inhalation of the p53 gene into the lungs preventing lung cancer works, a window of economic opportunity would show itself. Here's how it would turn out: Supposedly that this new gene therapy would work, it could be anticipated that there would be an increase in smokers and a higher demand in tobacco and cigarettes. With this higher demand, the prices would go up for cigarettes. With more and more money flowing into these tobacco businesses, the government can tax high

Perhaps the most effective counter-argument would be that if this does work, and if the germatic gene therapy works to avoid lung cancer, then there will be no more lung cancer in our society. However, again, only a minority of the population can afford this treatment and there is no guarantee that lung cancer will be a distant memory. If this treatment is successful, however, then one can view that this would be a great thing for humanity, just one less thing to worry about. On the contrary, the way we live and the way we view our bodies will be altered dramatically. Only the people can afford this gene therapy would have the pleasure to not worry as much about their health lifestyles, which would inevitably create a large hole in the social hierarchy.

er these businesses. With this extra money, investments in research in the cures for other diseases or from city projects can be started. There are relatively few objections religiously to agreeing with the treatment.

The second proposal, however, I would lean towards rejecting the idea of tampering with the germatic gen

Some common words found in the essay are:
War II, Here's Supposedly, THERAPY PROPOSALS, gene therapy, germatic gene therapy, germatic gene, lung cancer, p53 gene, gene therapy feel, therapy feel, fertilized egg, government tax, occur lead,
Approximate Word count = 735
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)