Moral Theory
A consequentialist moral theory is an action that is morally right if the consequences of the action is more favorable than unfavorable. Consequentialist principles require that we first take in effect both the good and bad consequences of any action and determine whether the total good outweighs the total bad consequences. If the good consequences are greater, then the action is moral. If the bad consequences are greater, then the action is not moral. Deontological theories are specific on principles of obligation. An example of this is, it is wrong to commit murder, steal or commit any other crimes in society. Many of us feel that there are clear obligations we have as human beings.John Stuart Mill believed in an ethical theory known as utilitarianism. He stated, "Everyone should act in such a way to bring the largest possibly balance of good over evil for everyone involved." Mill believed the goodness of an act might be determined by the consequences of that act. Consequences are determined by the amount of happiness or unhappiness caused, and a "good" man is one who considers the other man's pleasure or pain as equally as his own. Each person's happiness is equally important. Mill believed that a free act is not an undet
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
According Kant, Dare Actions, Universal Law, Stuart Mill, , Immanuel Kant, consequences action, mill believed, bad consequences, bad consequences action, dictates course action, imperative dictates course, kant believed, education told, dictates course, consequences action moral, action moral, categorical imperative, course action, difficult break,
Approximate Word count = 1020
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
