Comparative Analytical Essay: Benjamin Disraeli
Benjamin Disraeli was a politically engaged man. He was a Member of Parliament, Chancellor of the Exchequer, which is relatively like the United States' Secretary of the Treasury, and was twice the Prime Minister of Great Britain. Unlike many politicos of his day, however, Disraeli was heavily involved in issues of the common man of Victorian England, such as expanding suffrage to all taxpaying men, improving health facilities and practices, housing, trade unions, but most importantly, humanizing the working and living conditions of the lower-class in England. He addressed these issues with not only governmental involvement; Disraeli was a professional writer as well. He wrote both romantically and realistically, and molded public opinion with Cybil and Conigsby as much as he did with any legislation. The philosophies of this man are multifaceted, and his political experience combined with his influential literature give him no precise contemporary. However, there were many intellectuals of his time with whom he concurred and deterred about prevailing matters within Victorian England. There is the aspect of Disraeli's actual writing style that could be considered superficially insignificant, but is, in fact, a quite important fe
Disraeli and Carlyle, however, did not always bluntly disagree. While Carlyle's extremity over the issue of what kind of government is the most effective for recapturing the people is apparent, he and Disraeli relatively agree about the issue of body Disraeli basically created the idea of what he called "Tory (his political party) democracy", a philosophy advocating the maintenance of established institutions and traditional principles combined with political democracy made up of social and economic programs designed to benefit the common man. Disraeli's Tory vision of an England ruled by both aristocrats and "the common man" sparked what he called the Young England movement and redefined traditional Conservative party lines and ideology. Additionally, in his literature, he speaks simply of the "two nations... the Rich and the Poor (23)." He believed that his philosophy would provide the necessary method to reunite these two nations. However, a key reticence in Disraeli's ideology is that for all of his talk of "the common man," Disraeli was more concerned with his standing among the aristocrats. Thomas Carlyle had a similar mindset about the lack of trustworthiness in the common man. However, Carlyle was much more radical, and did not share similar views with Disraeli about the necessity of democracy. Carlyle completely hated the ideas of charity or philanthropy, seeing them as unnecessary gifts. Carlyle believed that the common man needs a strong and ruthless ruler, and that those people should obey him at all times. But Carlyle also disagree
Some common words found in the essay are:
Thomas Carlyle, Victorian England, Dickens Dickens, Disraeli Carlyle, Charles Dickens, Twist Disraeli, Disraeli's Tory, Benjamin Disraeli, British History, Dickens Disraeli, victorian england, charles dickens, benjamin disraeli, thomas carlyle, writing style, actual writing style, carlyle believed, living conditions, actual writing, addressed issues, faith people,
Approximate Word count = 1047
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
