99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Canadian Constitution

The constitution is the basic system of laws of a country, which defines and limits the powers of the ruling body. The Canadian constitution is a written document, which states the rules that construe and interpret the powers of federal and provincial governments, and authenticate the responsibilities and rights of the Canadian citizens. Among these laws are section 7, 11, 12 which set out rights that protect us in our dealings with the justice system. These specific sections ensure that individuals who are involved in legal proceedings are treated fairly and equally. In three specific cases, the funedamental rights, entrenched in the charter, challenged legislation. In the case of R. v. Morgentaler abortion laws were struck down because they violated the liberty and security of the women. Section 11(b) was used to rightfully dismiss the case of R. v. Askov because the trial was unreasonably delayed. The accused in the case of R. v. Smith was given an excessively cruel punishment, which is inconsistent with section 12 of the charter.

Section 7 of the constitution states that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in the accordance with the pr


unnecessary requirements that only significantly delay a pregnant woman's access to

Section 12 states that everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment. This section ensures that the government cannot treat individuals in a harsh manner or punish them excessively. Section 12 governs the quality of the punishment and is concerned with the effect the punishment will have on the accused. In R. v. Smith, section 12 was used to challenge the Narcotics Control Act that requires a minimum sentence of seven years. The accused was caught importing seven and a half ounces of cocaine into Canada, but thought a seven year minimum sentence was grossly excessive. They found the accused guilty and imposed an eight year sentence, because they thought that the Narcotics Control Act was not inconsistent with the charter. I believe that the Narcotics Control Act is in disagreement with section 12 because legislation has completely disregarded specific circumstances for each case. The personal characteristics of the offender and the personal circumstances of the case are not looked at when implementing the Narcotics Control Act. The quantity of drugs imported and the purpose of the importation are irrelevant to the minimum sentence. It doesn't matter if the drugs are for personal consumption or if it is specifically for trafficking, the sentence remains the same. The previous criminal record of the offender is also irrelevant when dealing with the offence of importation, therefore. With these circumstances overlooked, a verdict of guilt would lead to, in some cases, excessive punishment. This means that someone who travels to Canada with no previous criminal record and is caught importing an extremely small amount of marijuana for personal use would be given the minimum sentence of seven years. This sentence violates section 12 because it is cruel punishment which outrages the standards of decency. The harsh sentence is not necessary when sentencing small offenders and does not deter seriouse offenders. Specific factors must be looked at in order to obtain a fair sentence.

medical treatment. Stalling medical treatment results in additional danger to the woman's health, depriving her of her right to security of a person

Some common words found in the essay are:
Court Canada, Control Act, , Dr Morgentaler, Canada Section, section 7, section 12, security person, narcotics control act, narcotics control, section 11b, minimum sentence, control act, Narcotics Control, Supreme Court, section 7 guarantees, 7 guarantees, liberty security, section 251, supreme court canada, previous criminal record, section 11 section,
Approximate Word count = 1530
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Canadian Constitution

Combarison between US Bill of Rights and Charter of Rights and ...1443 words
Internet Censorship 31275 words
Quebecamp39s Quest for an independent nation2577 words
Defining Moments in Canadian History761 words
Canadaamp39s Constitution680 words

Look at even more essays on Canadian Constitution
More Foreign Essays

Professional Papers:
Canadian Social Structure1684 words
National Power in Canada1692 words
The Written Constitution2283 words
Canadian Teachers ampamp The Law5530 words
Constitutions and the UK2283 words
Pierre Trudeau1163 words
Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers