Community policing is defined as any method of policing that includes a police officer assigned to the same area, meeting and working with the residents and business people who live and work in the beat area. The citizens and police work together to identify the problems of the area and to collaborate in workable resolutions of the problems. Moving neighborhoods and communities toward solving their own problems, and encouraging citizens to help and look out for each other. To be successful, community policing requires the total commitment of the police, citizens and subgroups like business, media, political leaders and social service agencies and other institutions of the community. It is proactive, decentralized and personalized; it is ful

Leadership been around forever, but it was during the reform era and the community based era that started to have what is called centralized decision-making. That is one person making a final decision for all whom are under them. That proved to be very successive and was used since the 1900's to the mid 80's. The only problem was that only the top leader makes a decision and expects it to be followed. Another characteristic of a leader would be someone who is fair and not judgmental. During the following years to even further their improvement officers are now using what is called a de-centralized decision-making. What that is not only does the top person just makes a rule and expect it to be followed, but gets leaders as well as other in the work force to be involved in making the final decision. This occurred during the problem-oriented era.

Potential Corruption. Two of the key elements of community policing--decentralization and permanent assignments--conflict with the professional model's prescription for controlling corruption and limiting political influence. Centralized authority was one of the first reforms called for by the IACP a century ago, and the idea of mandatory rotation of assignments followed not long thereafter. An unintended consequence of community policing may be the development of the same close personal and political ties between individual officers and citizens along their beats that historically served as the breeding ground for petty corruption and undermined management's control of the rank and file.

By the turn of the century, the progressive movement began to promote professionalism in law enforcement as one of the basic components of rehabilitating municipal politics. Concern about corruption and brutality in local police forces resulted in State takeovers of some city departments and led to the creation of new State police organizations removed from the corrupting influences of local ward politics. Critics also questioned whether professionalism really was being practiced at the local level. Police departments installed civil service

Mission Ambiguity. Like the members of the San Francisco Police Department Community Relations Unit, many practitioners of community policing seem unsure of who to serve and how to serve them. Approaches range from neighborhood advocacy to aggressive street crime suppression. In their

http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=community+policing

Some common words found in the essay are:
Community Policing, Policing Community, Police Force, Police District, Effective Management, Evaluation Finally, Near Metropolis, Police Department, community policing, Potential Corruption, Limited Implementation, law enforcement, team policing, critical social, police officers, law enforcement agencies, program called, police citizens, officers community, enforcement agencies, social service, bureau justice assistance, justice assistance 1994, activities community policing, community policing critical,
Approximate Word count = 3928
Approximate Pages = 16 (250 words per page double spaced)