99,000 Essays & Term Papers: Where You Buy Essays and Papers Online
Direct Essays, Where You Can Buy Essays and Papers Online

Instant Access to Buy Essays and Papers Online!
Acceptable Use Policy
Customer Service
Site Search


Login to View Essays and Papers Online

Join Now - Instant Access to Essays and Research Papers!

  Essay and Research Paper Topics
Acceptance Essays
Arts Essays
Custom Essays
English Literature Essays
Foreign
History Essays
Miscellaneous Research Papers and Essays
Movie Essays and Papers
Music Term Papers
Novels
People and Biography Research Papers
Politics Research Papers
Religion Research Papers
Science Essay Topics
Sports Research Papers
Technology Research Papers
 
  FAQ
Technical Support
Site Map
Direct Essays
 

 



Welcome to Direct Essays

This is a short summary of this paper!

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!


Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900
Special! View this paper for FREE!
  

Hobbes and Rousseau

When comparing Hobbes and Rousseau's state of nature one must be aware of not only what the conditions are for each philosopher's realm of savagery. Each has a different setting, different time frame, and different abundance of resources. Where Rousseau sees a world much like the Garden of Eden, Hobbes' is much more brutal and cold. Rousseau had a specific time frame in mind; prehistory, where as Hobbes had no specific time frame. One of the few things they do have in common is that neither claim to be more than models, theoretical attempts to describe what life was like prior to civilization. The most important parts of these settings are the psychological compositions of the people living in each respective state. Hobbes argues that natural man has three inherent instincts which cause him to quarrel: competition, diffidence, and the want for glory. Rousseau believes we have two more tranquil instincts: pity and self love. The only thing his savage would need is nourishment and sex. The main difference that causes these drastically different models is not the removal of man from civilization, but the removal of civilization from man in Rousseau's. Hobbes' model has men thrashing about madly trying to get the material


comforts society had offered him while Rousseau's has men without any desires past satiating his biological requirements. The only thing that is the equal are the people to each other in each scenario. Equality, Hobbes writes, is what causes these horrid conditions because everyone wants the same things and wants all of it. However if self interest is also one of our main desires we would avoid that which would bring conflict and when struggles arise the absence of the concept of dignity would give no physical need to "win" a fight. Hobbes' ignores the biologically instilled notion of retreat and that self interest does not always equal avarice. Rousseau's therefor is more persuasive under his own rules.

The fact that in this model everyone is equal does not therefor mean people are going to kill for everything. Just because there is an "equality of attaining of hope in attaining our means" if those means aren't too rare there would be no problem in attaining them. The fact that everyone would be equal would simply give us each a comfortable niche in resources, being happy to eat from the same tree so long as it was constant.

While neither claims to be anthropologically correct Rousseau contends that his state is "...your history as I have thought to read it, not in the books of your fellowmen who are liars, but in nature, who never lies." While the theory of evolution did not appear until the mid-19th century Rousseau seems to describe an Australopithecus-like creature with his limited 18th century viewpoint. A creature without the capacity for tools or fire in the cornucopian center of Africa would only fight over terri

Some common words found in the essay are:
Equality Hobbes, Eden Hobbes', Rousseau's Hobbes', Hobbes Rousseau's, Ben Carr, competition diffidence glory, diffidence glory, rousseau's nature, rousseau believes, catch kill, hobbes writes, removal civilization, competition diffidence, specific frame, pity self,
Approximate Word count = 1107
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Hobbes and Rousseau

Political theories of Hobbes710 words
HobbesRousseau2078 words
Are Humans Good Or Evil732 words
Covenanted Governments1648 words
Thomas Hobbes vs. JeanJacques Rousseau918 words

Look at even more essays on Hobbes and Rousseau
More People Essays

Professional Papers:
Hobbes and the State of Nature1911 words
Three Social Contract Theories2022 words
Hobbes, Lock and Rousseau2434 words
Ideas of Locke, Rousseau ampamp Hobbes1230 words
Rousseau1659 words
Locke, Hobbes and Roussau on Government1052 words
Special! View this paper for FREE!
Click here to JoinNow!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

 

All papers and essays are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright 2002-2009 Direct Essays , LLC. All Rights Reserved. DMCA
Webmasters make $$$$
Saved Papers